China’s Commercial Space Race Eyes 2026 as the Year of Reusable Rockets

At a Beijing forum, chief engineers from three leading Chinese commercial space firms unveiled competing plans to prove reusable rocket technology in 2026. Their strategies differ—batch production and engine upgrades, large kerolox modular rockets, and a dual small/large vehicle path—yet all target lower costs and higher cadence to serve satellite‑internet constellations.

A detailed look at SpaceX rocket assembly in an advanced industrial facility with engineering equipment.

Key Takeaways

  • 1Blue Arrow (Zhuque‑3) aims for first‑stage return and reflight in 2026, then batch production and a 100‑ton engine upgrade for an 18t LEO payload.
  • 2Galaxy Dynamics (Zhishen‑2) targets a 2026 maiden flight for a 4.5m‑diameter modular kerolox rocket with 20t LEO capacity, leveraging large engines and 3D printing.
  • 3CAS Space pursues a dual‑track approach: high‑cadence small rockets for rideshare plus larger recoverable vehicles validated via suborbital Lihong flights; Lihong‑2 full recovery tests are planned for 2026.
  • 4All firms prioritise re‑entry thermal protection, guidance, rapid post‑flight servicing and manufacturing standardisation to reduce costs and scale launches.
  • 52026 is positioned as a decisive year: successful reusability demonstrations would materially lower launch costs and accelerate satellite‑internet deployments in China.

Editor's
Desk

Strategic Analysis

The three road maps unveiled in Beijing illustrate both convergence and divergence in China’s private launch sector. Convergence appears in the shared objective of first‑stage recovery, emphasis on manufacturability, and the race to serve satellite‑internet demand. Divergence shows up in technical trade‑offs: larger kerolox engines and modularity promise high single‑launch capacity but require complex throttleable propulsion and heavier infrastructure; smaller solid and hybrid vehicles enable rapid cadence and reliability but deliver lower per‑launch mass. Practically, China’s pathway to routine reuse will be incremental—suborbital parachute returns, guided propulsive or aerodynamic decelerations, and finally rapid refurbishment cycles. Policymakers and investors should expect a patchwork of partial successes, regional industrial scaling, and continued state–private interplay: national launch infrastructure and export controls will shape which firms can scale globally. Geopolitically, a credible Chinese reusability capability will intensify competition with incumbents like SpaceX, raise the stakes for space traffic management, and sharpen dual‑use considerations for both civilian and defence planners.

China Daily Brief Editorial
Strategic Insight
China Daily Brief

Three of China’s leading private rocket designers used a Beijing forum this month to set out competing road maps for reusable launch vehicles, signalling that 2026 could be a make-or-break year for domestic reusability. Faced with the vast lift and cost demands of satellite‑internet constellations, companies Blue Arrow (蓝箭航天), Galaxy Dynamics/Star River (星河动力) and CAS Space (中科宇航) laid out contrasting technical choices and aggressive timelines aimed at closing China’s launch-capacity gap.

Blue Arrow presented a three‑phase plan for its Zhuque‑3 vehicle that begins with consolidating first‑stage recovery and achieving a reflight this year, then moves to batch production at facilities in Jiuquan, Wuxi and Jiaxing with an eventual annual output target around 20–30 launches. Beyond production scaling, the firm intends to develop a larger Zhuque‑3A variant, test sea‑platform and return‑to‑land recovery modes, and re‑engineer the vehicle around a new 100‑ton‑class Tianque B engine to lift about 18 tonnes to LEO.

Galaxy Dynamics’ chief designer framed a different bet: the Zhishen‑2 is a large, modular liquid rocket using deep‑throttle, 100‑ton‑class LOX‑kerosene engines and extensive 3D‑printed, integrated structures. The company says Zhishen‑2 will be able to lift roughly 20 tonnes to low orbit, with a basic variant massing about 757 tonnes at liftoff, and it is targeting a first flight before the end of 2026 after a successful full‑system hot‑fire test of its CQ‑90 engine.

CAS Space is pursuing a deliberate “dual‑track” strategy that mixes high‑cadence small vehicles with larger, recoverable launchers. Its small solid and hybrid beneficiaries—Lijian‑1 rockets—have completed multiple rideshare launches and have placed more than 80 satellites into orbit, while the Lihong suborbital testbed has already demonstrated a parachute recovery from a 100‑km flight. CAS plans to use Lihong vehicles to mature parachute and first‑stage recovery before integrating those lessons into two‑stage fully recoverable systems, with a Lihong‑2 demonstrator slated for flight tests by the end of 2026.

All three teams emphasised technical priorities that mirror global trends: thermal protection and aerodynamic loads for re‑entry, high‑precision guidance and control for pinpoint returns, streamlined post‑flight maintenance regimes, and manufacturing methods—particularly additive manufacturing and standardised modular design—to compress costs and cycle times. Blue Arrow highlighted high‑strength stainless steel and laser‑welded tanks as part of its materials approach, while Galaxy Dynamics emphasised large‑engine architecture and 3D printing for integration and weight saving.

The commercial imperative is clear. Satellite‑internet constellations require an unprecedented launch cadence and low per‑kilogram costs; reusable first stages and routine rapid turnarounds are the most direct route to those economics. Chinese private firms are pitching production and operational models—ranging from 20–30 launches per year per factory to claimed per‑kilogram prices as low as RMB30,000—that, if realised, would materially lower barriers to mass constellation deployment and intensify international competition.

Technical and operational risks remain substantial. Past tests provide both encouragement and caution: Blue Arrow’s December 2025 Zhuque‑3 inaugural flight achieved orbital insertion of an upper stage but failed to recover the first stage, even as it validated numerous reusability subsystems. Parachute and suborbital recoveries, such as CAS Space’s Lihong‑1 mission, demonstrate incremental progress but do not yet prove routine, rapid reuse at scale.

If 2026 delivers successful first‑stage recoveries and re‑flights from any of these programmes it will shift the economics and industrial dynamics of Chinese space. Success would accelerate domestic constellation projects, attract further private capital, and pressure incumbents—both state and private—to scale up. Conversely, setbacks will likely slow ambitions, impose heavier reliance on expendable architectures, and keep launch costs higher for longer.

Share Article

Related Articles

📰
No related articles found