Off-Season Rebound: China’s Big-City Second‑Hand Housing Market Warms Ahead of Spring

Second‑hand home sales in China’s four first‑tier cities have warmed in January despite the traditional off‑season, led by Beijing and Shanghai where transactions rose while listings fell. The rebound is concentrated in core districts and school‑district properties and reflects a mix of policy support, reduced asking inventories and recovering buyer confidence, though price recovery remains uneven and fragile.

Wooden house model in hand symbolizing real estate concepts on pink background.

Key Takeaways

  • 1January resale volumes in major cities rose: Beijing ~15,082 net signings, Shanghai ~22,834, Shenzhen 6,802, Guangzhou 8,881.
  • 2Listings have fallen notably in core cities (Shanghai listings down from ~120,000 in Apr 2025 to 89,000 in Jan 2026), narrowing bargaining and shortening sale cycles.
  • 3Policy tweaks (e.g., Beijing’s Dec. 24 support measures) and concentration of demand in school‑district and core‑area homes are major drivers of the rebound.
  • 4Price decline has moderated but not reversed: Beijing and Shanghai second‑hand prices slipped month‑on‑month with growing structural divergence between core and non‑core areas.
  • 5Recovery remains fragile — substantial overall inventory and uneven regional performance mean broader stabilisation will require further policy and economic support.

Editor's
Desk

Strategic Analysis

This winter’s ‘‘off‑season’’ uplift in first‑tier second‑hand markets signals more than a seasonal blip: it shows how targeted policy loosening and improved seller expectations can unlock significant latent demand in liquid urban cores, especially for school‑linked housing. For Beijing and other political actors, a controlled upturn is politically useful — it stabilises household wealth effects and supports bank asset quality without reigniting overheating in weaker submarkets. Yet the recovery’s narrow base — concentrated in core districts and specific product types — leaves risks intact. If job and income prospects falter or if listings elsewhere re‑emerge en masse, the modest spring could evaporate. Policymakers therefore face a delicate balancing act: preserve momentum in resilient submarkets while tackling structural oversupply, simplifying transactions and restoring broader consumer confidence to turn a tentative rebound into sustained stabilisation.

China Daily Brief Editorial
Strategic Insight
China Daily Brief

China’s once-sluggish second-hand housing market in its biggest cities has shown an unexpected burst of activity this January, defying the usual winter lull. Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and Guangzhou all reported month-on-month gains in resales, with Beijing net signings topping 15,000 units, Shanghai exceeding 22,800, Shenzhen hitting a near‑10‑month high of 6,802 and Guangzhou recording 8,881 second‑hand residential transactions.

The bounce is being driven by a mixture of policy nudges, shifting seller psychology and timing effects from the Lunar New Year. New measures in Beijing — announced in late December — loosened non‑local purchase thresholds, supported additional purchases for multi‑child families and eased some loan terms, while broader local support and earlier interest‑rate stability have helped release latent demand, particularly among buyers hunting for school‑district properties.

A complementary factor is the fall in advertised supply. Listings in the first‑tier cities have trended down: head brokerage listings in Beijing have dropped to about 125,600 units, while Shanghai’s advertised stock slid from roughly 120,000 in April 2025 to 89,000 in January 2026. Lower inventory, together with narrower bargaining ranges and shorter time‑to‑sale, has tightened the market micro‑mechanics and supported transaction volumes.

The rebound has a clear internal structure. Much of the demand is concentrated in high‑quality, core‑area stock and school‑district flats, where price corrections of the past four years have made units more attractive to buyers. Brokers in Beijing and Shanghai reported sharp upticks in turnover for reasonably priced school‑district apartments, and some sellers have even withdrawn listings to convert properties into rentals, citing renovation‑led yields of roughly 3.3–3.5% on older, well‑located units.

Guangzhou and Shenzhen are showing similar, if more measured, signs of recovery. Guangzhou’s January resales and floor area both edged up, with growth concentrated in peripheral districts. Shenzhen posted resilient monthly gains and a large year‑on‑year rise — a signal that buyer confidence in that city has recovered substantially after an extended slowdown; average resale prices there remain elevated, with a January second‑hand average near RMB 50,800 per square metre.

For all the upbeat headlines, the recovery is partial and uneven. Nationwide data show that January resale prices in Beijing and Shanghai still slipped month‑on‑month, albeit by smaller amounts, and there is pronounced divergence between core and non‑core submarkets. Older, outlying neighbourhoods and many mass‑market units remain under downward pressure, and the overall stock of listed units is still sizeable, meaning de‑stocking will take time.

The immediate policy implication is pragmatic: modest, targeted support and improved market signalling have rekindled activity in the most liquid parts of China’s housing market without precipitating a broad upswing in prices. But sustaining a broader recovery will require deeper fixes — lower transaction costs, clearer regulatory order and better employment and income prospects for would‑be buyers. Observers will be watching post‑New Year listing flows, the pace of price divergence across districts, and whether this ‘‘small spring’’ broadens beyond school‑district and core‑area deals into the wider second‑hand universe.

Share Article

Related Articles

📰
No related articles found