UN Aid Convoy Struck by Drone in Central Sudan, Underscoring Growing Risks to Humanitarian Access

A UN World Food Programme convoy was struck by a drone in North Kordofan on 6 February, killing one and injuring three. The attack, blamed on the Rapid Support Forces, highlights escalating risks to humanitarian access amid a two-year war that has killed nearly 30,000 people.

Majestic Gullfoss waterfall with mist and lush greenery in Iceland.

Key Takeaways

  • 1A WFP-affiliated aid convoy was attacked by a drone in Al-Akrim, North Kordofan, causing one death and three injuries.
  • 2Local medical sources accused the Rapid Support Forces; the RSF had not responded to the allegation.
  • 3The strike comes amid intensified fighting in Kordofan between the Sudanese Armed Forces, the RSF and allied groups.
  • 4The attack raises the prospect of reduced humanitarian access, greater danger for aid workers, and increased risk of food insecurity for displaced populations.

Editor's
Desk

Strategic Analysis

This incident is emblematic of how the Sudan war has evolved into a multidimensional conflict in which humanitarian operations are increasingly targeted or collateral victims. Control of roads and logistics corridors has become a strategic objective, making convoys themselves military-relevant and vulnerable to drone strikes and ambushes. That dynamic will push aid organisations toward risk-averse postures that reduce coverage precisely where need is acute, while also making attribution and accountability harder in a fragmented battlefield. International responses will likely include sharper diplomatic pressure, calls for independent investigations and possibly targeted measures against units deemed responsible, but without a credible ceasefire and safe-passage guarantees these steps will do little to restore reliable access. The broader implication is a deepening humanitarian catastrophe that could spill across borders, complicate regional stability, and harden the international community's dilemma between protecting staff and meeting the urgent needs of millions of Sudanese civilians.

China Daily Brief Editorial
Strategic Insight
China Daily Brief

On 6 February a United Nations World Food Programme convoy was hit by a drone strike in the Al-Akrim area of North Kordofan while travelling to the state capital, El Obeid. A local medical network reported one person killed and three wounded; the convoy was carrying supplies intended for displaced civilians. The Sudan Doctors Network attributed the attack to the Rapid Support Forces, which had not issued a comment by evening.

The strike came as the convoy was delivering food and other relief to populations displaced by months of fighting across the Kordofan states. Humanitarian workers describe the area as increasingly contested, with front lines and supply routes shifting as the Sudanese Armed Forces, the Rapid Support Forces and allied groups such as the Sudan People Liberation Movement North vie for control. Attacks on aid deliveries risk severing lifelines for tens of thousands of civilians already reliant on external assistance.

The assault is the latest escalation in a conflict that began with open fighting between the SAF and the RSF in Khartoum in April 2023 and has since spread into multiple regions, including Kordofan. More than two years of sustained violence have killed nearly 30,000 people and displaced millions, creating a complex crisis of access for international agencies. The use of drones in attacks on humanitarian convoys signals both a technological intensification of the war and a growing disregard for the neutrality of relief operations.

The immediate consequence is likely to be a tightening of operations by the United Nations and partner agencies while they reassess security protocols and routes. Donor governments face hard choices about whether to increase funding and security support, or to pull staff out and scale back deliveries, either of which would deepen suffering. International actors may seek formal investigations and public condemnations, but the fractured command structures and competing narratives on the ground will complicate accountability and the reestablishment of safe humanitarian corridors.

Share Article

Related Articles

📰
No related articles found