The Great Pivot: Why China’s Leading Strategists are De-risking from the US AI Boom

East Money’s Chief Strategist Chen Guo is advocating for a strategic rebalancing of portfolios away from the concentrated US AI CAPEX chain toward domestic Chinese assets. Citing slowing growth rates and rising regulatory risks in the AI sector, the analysis suggests that the current market volatility presents a unique opportunity to diversify into undervalued financial and energy sectors.

A vibrant abstract macro photo of oil bubbles on a gradient surface, creating a colorful pattern.

Key Takeaways

  • 1US AI CAPEX growth is projected to plummet from 80% to under 20% over the next 18 months, signaling a cycle peak.
  • 2Increasing public opposition to data center construction and rising regulatory restrictions are creating unforeseen hurdles for AI expansion.
  • 3Major tech players like Meta are shifting toward in-house AI tools to mitigate high costs, threatening the revenue models of external AI providers.
  • 4A-share rebalancing focuses on domestic AI chains, financial services, and 'reopening' trades as safer alternatives to crowded US tech positions.

Editor's
Desk

Strategic Analysis

This shift in rhetoric from a major Chinese brokerage signifies a broader pivot in institutional sentiment toward 'self-reliance' and risk mitigation. While the Western market remains fixated on the transformative potential of AI, Chinese strategists are increasingly viewing the sector through the lens of a classic industrial bubble, drawing parallels to the 2021 EV peak. By framing 'rebalancing' not as a bear case against AI, but as a rational diversification into domestic weights and energy assets, firms like East Money are preparing investors for a world where US-China tech decoupling and capital expenditure cycles dictate returns more than raw technological innovation.

China Daily Brief Editorial
Strategic Insight
China Daily Brief

For months, the global investment narrative has been dominated by a singular, high-octane trade: the American AI infrastructure chain. Yet, as the frenzy reaches a fever pitch, leading Chinese analysts are beginning to signal a tactical retreat. Chen Guo, Chief Strategy Officer at East Money Research Institute, suggests that the market’s current obsession with a handful of Silicon Valley giants has reached a point of 'extreme polarization' that demands an immediate rebalancing toward more resilient assets.

The logic behind this shift is rooted in the inevitable cooling of capital expenditure. While the U.S. AI CAPEX chain saw growth rates hitting 80%, historical cycles suggest a sharp deceleration is imminent, with projections falling below 20% within the next 18 months. This trajectory mirrors the peak of the electric vehicle bubble in late 2021, where the focus narrowed to the most expensive upstream components just before a broader market correction took hold.

Institutional skepticism is further fueled by mounting operational and regulatory headwinds facing top-tier AI labs. Companies like Anthropic and OpenAI are navigating a complex landscape of surging losses, internal 'price wars,' and increasing protectionism that restricts their global service reach. Furthermore, tech titans like Meta are already signaling a move toward internal model development to curb spiraling costs, potentially cannibalizing the very third-party AI market that investors are currently betting on.

Within the Chinese domestic market, this 'rebalancing' strategy advocates for a pivot away from crowded tech trades toward undervalued sectors. Chen points to domestic AI supply chains, non-bank financials, and traditional energy as fertile ground for capital rotation. As global sentiment fluctuates between euphoria and hesitation, the window to capture these 'rebalanced' gains is narrowing, offering a strategic advantage to those willing to look beyond the immediate noise of the AI sector.

Share Article

Related Articles

📰
No related articles found