# missile defense
Latest news and articles about missile defense
Total: 5 articles found
Cheap Strike, Costly Defense: Iran Exposes Gaps in US-Led Middle East Missile Shield
A U.S.-backed missile‑defence network in the Middle East has been undercut by Iranian strikes that damaged key sensors and overwhelmed interceptors. The crisis reveals a growing strategic and economic mismatch: cheap Iranian missiles and drones are eroding the effectiveness and stockpiles of expensive Western interceptors.
U.S. Moves THAAD Interceptors from South Korea to Middle East, Raising Alliance and Deterrence Questions
The U.S. has begun transferring THAAD interceptors from South Korea to the Middle East, moving up to 48 missiles from Seongju to Osan for onward transport. Seoul objects but accepts limited leverage, while the redeployment highlights logistical limits in U.S. missile-defence inventories and raises questions about regional deterrence and alliance reassurance.
U.S. Repositions Part of THAAD from Korea to the Middle East, Shifting Missile‑Defence Priorities
The United States has shifted part of the THAAD missile‑defence system from South Korea to the Middle East, a partial redeployment that reallocates precious defensive assets in response to concurrent crises. The move reduces one point of friction with China but raises questions about deterrence on the Korean peninsula and the strategic tradeoffs facing Washington and its allies.
Iran Parades Advanced Ballistic Missile Ahead of US Talks, Signalling Hardened Deterrence
The IRGC unveiled the Khorramshahr‑4 medium‑range ballistic missile and an underground missile facility on 4 February, touting a 2,000 km range, 1,500 kg warhead and improved accuracy and re‑entry speed. The demonstration, timed ahead of narrowly focused US‑Iran nuclear talks in Muscat, is a strategic signal that Iran's missile deterrent is non‑negotiable and intended to shape regional and Western calculations.
Greenland Game: Trump’s ‘Framework’ Exposes a U.S. Push for Arctic Access and Resources
President Trump’s claim of a NATO‑backed ‘framework’ on Greenland, promising U.S. “full access” without payment, has provoked firm rejections from Denmark and Greenland. The alleged deal appears aimed at expanding U.S. military access — including stationing a missile‑defence system — and securing preferential rights to Greenland’s strategic minerals, but it runs headlong into legal sovereignty and alliance politics.