A‑Shares End the Lunar Year Lower as Traders Rotate into AI Hardware; Memory and PCB Stocks Lead Sector Divergence

China’s A‑share indices closed lower on the final trading day of the Year of the Snake, with turnover subdued ahead of the Lunar New Year. Investors rotated into robotics, PCB materials and memory‑adjacent stocks after bullish commentary on embodied AI and signs of a sharp rally in DRAM prices, while CPO‑related names plunged.

A futuristic humanoid robot in an indoor Tokyo setting, showcasing modern technology.

Key Takeaways

  • 1Shanghai Composite fell 1.26%; Shenzhen Component down 1.28%; ChiNext down 1.57%; market turnover ~RMB1.98 trillion.
  • 2Robotics and storage‑chip related stocks rallied sharply after bullish comments from Yushu Technology’s CEO and a surge in DRAM prices reported by Counterpoint.
  • 3Japanese materials supplier Resonac announced >30% price hikes for copper‑clad laminates and adhesive films, lifting domestic PCB‑materials shares.
  • 4CPO concept stocks plunged, with several names down double digits, highlighting sectoral divergence amid thin pre‑holiday liquidity.
  • 5Market breadth was weak — about 3,900 listed stocks closed lower — signalling selective flows and elevated short‑term volatility.

Editor's
Desk

Strategic Analysis

The trading pattern exposes a market in tactical repositioning: investors are shifting scarce capital toward hardware plays that stand to benefit from an anticipated acceleration in AI‑driven server demand, even as the broader economy and equity market display fragility. That bifurcation has strategic implications. If memory prices remain elevated, suppliers and materials producers will enjoy stronger margins and possibly higher capex, further strengthening China’s onshore supply chain. Conversely, sustained input‑price inflation from overseas vendors such as Resonac could force downstream firms to raise prices or accept margin compression, complicating policy trade‑offs for Beijing between supporting technological self‑sufficiency and containing consumer inflation. Finally, the market’s thin pre‑holiday liquidity means short‑term price moves are poor guides to sustained trends; investors should watch whether these sector rallies survive the liquidity rebound after the holiday and how global demand for servers evolves in response to AI deployments.

China Daily Brief Editorial
Strategic Insight
China Daily Brief

China's A‑share market closed the lunar year on a downbeat note as the three main indices fell throughout the trading day. The Shanghai Composite slid 1.26% to 4,082.07, the Shenzhen Component dropped 1.28% to 14,100.19, and the ChiNext index declined 1.57% to 3,275.96. Turnover across Shanghai and Shenzhen was roughly RMB1.98 trillion, reflecting thin, holiday‑affected liquidity and a market that favoured selective sector bets over broad buying.

Beneath the headline falls there was significant sector divergence. Robotics and storage‑chip related names jumped in the afternoon session: robotics supplier Dual‑Lin (双林股份) rose more than 10%, and several peers including precision‑engineering and automation companies hit daily limits. Storage and DRAM‑sensitive stocks such as Shen Technology (深科技) also rallied, while PCB (printed circuit board) materials shares retraced earlier losses and pushed some names to fresh highs.

Three news items appear to have driven sector rotation. First, the CEO of robotics firm Yushu Technology, Wang Xingxing, told state TV he expects “embodied intelligence” — physical AI systems and robots — to generate demand far beyond that of the mobile internet era if large‑scale models and robotics breakthroughs materialise. Second, Japanese semiconductor materials producer Resonac announced price increases of more than 30% for copper‑clad laminates and adhesive films used in PCBs starting March 1, a move that directly lifted domestic PCB‑materials stocks. Third, market research firm Counterpoint reported that memory prices rose 80–90% quarter‑on‑quarter into Q1 2026, driven by a sharp spike in server DRAM pricing, supporting a wave of buying in chip‑adjacent names.

Not all themes held up. CPO‑linked stocks (a grouping in A‑share parlance that includes companies tied to certain chip‑packaging or optical interconnect themes) suffered heavy losses: leading names fell double digits and several hit intraday limits to the downside. The overall pattern — pockets of speculative strength around AI and hardware supply chains versus broad market weakness — underlines investor nervousness in the thin pre‑holiday tape.

The market’s muted breadth — roughly 3,900 stocks in Shanghai, Shenzhen and Beijing finished in the red — and turnover below the RMB2 trillion threshold suggest many institutional players were standing aside ahead of the long Lunar New Year holiday. That amplifies the effect of concentrated flows: positive headlines for a single sub‑sector can produce sharp rallies, while worries about cyclicality or policy can precipitate steep selloffs elsewhere.

For international observers, today’s moves matter for two reasons. First, they reveal where Chinese investors are placing their bets ahead of the AI hardware cycle: memory suppliers, PCB materials and robotics equipment are being priced as the near‑term beneficiaries of higher server demand and possible supply shocks. Second, price adjustments by overseas suppliers like Resonac show how global supply‑chain decisions translate quickly into equity re‑ratings in China, with implications for corporate margins and for the pace of domestic capacity expansion in semiconductor materials.

Looking ahead, the market will likely remain sensitive to data on global inflation and US demand — variables that sway server and DRAM consumption — as well as to any follow‑through from Japanese and other suppliers’ price moves. The recall of investor attention toward physical AI (robots, sensors, materials) complements software‑first narratives and could lengthen the investment runway for hardware suppliers, but not without risk: valuation re‑rating can be abrupt in a thin market, and higher input prices can squeeze OEM margins if end‑market demand softens.

Share Article

Related Articles

📰
No related articles found