# Trump
Latest news and articles about Trump
Total: 161 articles found
Washington Threatens 15% Global Import Duty This Week, Renewing Trade Uncertainty for China and Allies
U.S. officials indicated a temporary global import duty could rise from 10% to 15% imminently, a move designed to replace tariffs the Supreme Court found legally unsupported. The administration says it will seek to reinstate higher, more defensible tariffs within five months using other trade statutes, a plan that has unsettled markets and alarmed trade partners.
When AI Becomes a Bayonet: Trump’s Crackdown, Anthropic’s Stand and OpenAI’s Quick Capitulation
A NetEase commentary argues that recent U.S. actions against AI firms have transformed generative models into instruments of state power. The piece links a U.S. move to restrict Anthropic, Anthropic’s resistance, and OpenAI’s swift compliance, using the episode to warn of a fragmented, securitized global AI landscape.
Cornered on Two Fronts: Middle East Escalation and a Court-Ordered Tariff Refund Put New U.S. Administration Under Strain
A sudden escalation of attacks between the United States, Israel and Iran has spread across the Gulf, disrupting energy and shipping and threatening higher inflation. At the same time, U.S. courts have ordered the rollback and likely refunding of large parts of President Trump’s tariff regime, removing a key foreign-policy and economic lever and exposing the administration to significant fiscal and political strain.
Drone Strike on U.S. Embassy in Riyadh Sends Oil and Gold Higher as Trump Warns of Retaliation
A drone attack on the U.S. embassy in Riyadh and U.S. signals of military retaliation triggered sharp moves in global markets on March 3, lifting oil, fuel, and precious metals. President Trump’s War Powers notice and his warning of imminent retaliation have increased the risk premium on Gulf supplies and heightened the prospect of further escalation.
Confrontation in the Gulf: US‑Israeli Strikes Trigger Sweeping Iranian Counterattacks and Command Losses
US and Israeli strikes on Iran initiated a rapid series of retaliatory attacks by Tehran, with both sides claiming significant battlefield effects. The confrontation has killed senior Iranian commanders, damaged state media infrastructure, and prompted European leaders to warn they may take defensive action, raising the risk of wider regional instability and prolonged asymmetric warfare.
Trump Vows to Keep Pressing Iran Militarily; Tehran Says It Alone Will Decide When the Fighting Ends
President Trump said the United States and Israel will continue military operations against Iran until their objectives are met, even after three U.S. service members were killed in an Iranian counterstrike. Iran’s foreign minister responded that Tehran will decide when and how the conflict ends, citing a decentralised defence strategy that it says will blunt strikes on its leadership and capital.
Pentagon Admits No Intelligence of an Iranian First Strike, Undercutting U.S. Justification for Attacks
In a closed-door briefing, Pentagon officials told Congress they have no intelligence that Iran planned to attack U.S. forces first, undercutting a key justification for recent U.S. and Israeli strikes that killed Iran’s supreme leader. The disclosure has intensified domestic criticism, split public opinion, and raised questions about legal and diplomatic grounds for further escalation.
Inside the Strike That Toppled Iran’s Supreme Leader: How a Joint U.S.–Israeli Operation Rewrote the Rules of Engagement
A coordinated U.S.–Israeli air strike that killed Iran’s supreme leader represents a tactical and strategic turning point in the Middle East, combining unprecedented co‑basing of aircraft, improved precision targeting and expanded allied air‑defence integration. The operation lowers the threshold for direct strikes on top leadership, raises the prospect of further escalation and accelerates regional realignment, particularly among Gulf states.
U.S. Officials Admit No Intelligence of Iranian Preemptive Strike, Deepening Questions About Rationale for Action
U.S. officials privately told Congress there was no intelligence showing Iran planned a preemptive strike against American forces, conflicting with public statements that cited such a threat as justification for action. The admission raises questions about the legal and political rationale for recent U.S. measures, heightening congressional scrutiny and complicating relations with allies while increasing the risk of regional miscalculation.
U.S. Strikes on Tehran Ignite Nationwide Antiwar Upheaval and Constitutional Backlash
Mass protests erupted across the United States after coordinated U.S.-Israeli strikes on Tehran, with demonstrators and civil liberties groups accusing the president of waging war without congressional authorization. The strikes, critics say, risk regional escalation and may have been timed to distract from mounting domestic political pressures, forcing a renewed national debate over war powers and executive authority.
US Lawmakers Call Trump’s Strike on Iran an 'Illegal War' Without Imminent Threat
Bipartisan criticism in the US Congress has condemned President Trump’s recent strike on Iran as an unlawful war conducted without an imminent threat and without adequate congressional briefing. The move has sparked domestic political fallout within Trump’s coalition, public protests abroad, and fresh debate over executive war powers and the risk of wider regional escalation.
Air Raids Rock Tehran — Widespread Strikes Trigger Panic and Fresh Regional Fears
A surprise series of US–Israeli airstrikes struck Tehran on the morning of Feb. 28, provoking widespread panic, school evacuations and communications difficulties. The operation — broader than previous strikes — targeted security and state-linked sites and was accompanied by a US presidential appeal urging Iranians to rise against their government, raising the stakes for regional escalation.