Defense & StrategyAnalysis

China Defense Ministry Addresses Taiwan Strait Transit, Japan Policy, and Arms Exports

Beijing issues warnings over regional naval passages and Japanese defense restructuring while confirming arms cooperation norms.

Share
Side view of mature colonel with order standing near microphones on asphalt pavement behind army of soldiers near airplane monument under serene sky during national military holiday and looking away
Photo by Antonio Prado on Pexels

The Brief

At a regular press briefing, China's Ministry of National Defense outlined its stances across several regional security issues. Spokesperson Senior Colonel Jiang Bin confirmed that the People's Liberation Army tracked New Zealand naval vessels transiting the Taiwan Strait and urged Wellington to avoid sending conflicting signals to separatist forces. The ministry also sharply criticized Japan's reported plans to create a new defense industry coordination entity, citing post-World War II legal frameworks, and defended bilateral military trade with Uzbekistan as normal cooperation that complies with international law.

Why it matters

The Ministry of National Defense's statements underscore Beijing's firm legal and military baseline regarding sovereignty in the Taiwan Strait and its sensitivity toward Japan's defense posture. By invoking historical post-war declarations against Japanese defense industry expansion and monitoring allied naval movements through the strait, China reinforces its regional security red lines while defending its growing arms export footprint abroad.

China context

Beijing consistently refers to the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation, and Japan's Instrument of Surrender to challenge Tokyo's defense spending and security shifts under historical international law. Simultaneously, China frames forums like the Xiangshan Forum as inclusive non-bloc alternatives to Western security frameworks, while asserting military tracking over maritime traffic in the Taiwan Strait to reinforce its claim of jurisdiction and sovereignty.

Editor's View

EDITOR'S VIEW — Analysis and inference, not factual reporting. The briefing illustrates Beijing's dual-track diplomatic and military messaging. While China promotes platforms like the Xiangshan Forum as open venues for dialogue free from bloc confrontation, its military rhetoric remains rigid when addressing allied naval movements in the Taiwan Strait and Japanese security policy. Framing Japan's defense administrative restructuring as potential resurgence of militarism serves to rally domestic sentiment and appeal to regional sensitivities, even as China actively normalizes its own defense exports to partner states.

What to watch

  • Reactions from New Zealand and regional partners regarding Chinese monitoring of Taiwan Strait transits.
  • Legislative and political developments in Japan concerning the proposed 2027 defense industrial entity.
  • Official operational deployments and further deliveries related to Chinese fighter jet exports in Central Asia.

Key Takeaways

  • 1Chinese military forces tracked and monitored New Zealand naval vessels transiting the Taiwan Strait, urging Wellington to uphold the one-China principle.
  • 2The Defense Ministry invoked the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Proclamation to criticize Japan's planned defense industry coordination body slated for 2027.
  • 3Beijing affirmed that its arms trade cooperation with Uzbekistan adheres to international law and is not directed at third parties.
  • 4Spokesperson Jiang Bin promoted the Xiangshan Forum as an inclusive, non-aligned platform addressing both traditional security and emerging defense challenges.
China's Ministry of National Defense addressed key regional security concerns during its regular monthly press briefing, commenting on foreign naval movements in the Taiwan Strait, Japanese defense industrial reforms, and international military trade. According to transcripts published by China Military Online, spokesperson Senior Colonel Jiang Bin responded to reports concerning the passage of New Zealand naval vessels through the Taiwan Strait, identified as the frigate HMNZS Te Mana and the replenishment tanker HMNZS Aotearoa. Jiang stated that the Chinese military organized naval and air forces to track, monitor, and handle the transit throughout the entire process in accordance with laws and regulations. He urged New Zealand to adhere to the one-China principle and refrain from sending wrong signals to Taiwan independence separatist forces. Jiang also sharply criticized reported plans by the Japanese government to establish a new defense-related corporate body in fiscal year 2027. The proposed entity reportedly aims to coordinate defense equipment exports, support emerging enterprises, bolster production capacity, and manage nationalized munitions facilities, partly adopting U.S. practices of purchasing equipment from domestic contractors for export. Pointing to criticism from Japanese opposition parties comparing the plan to pre-war arsenals, Jiang cited historical legal instruments including the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation, and the Japanese Instrument of Surrender. He argued that these frameworks legally bound Japan to complete disarmament and prohibited maintaining industries that could facilitate rearmament, accusing Tokyo of pursuing offensive capabilities and expanding its military-industrial base. Separately, responding to questions regarding reports that Uzbekistan's air force received Chinese-made J-10CE fighter aircraft, Jiang stated that relations between China and Uzbekistan remain friendly, according to a report carried by ifeng.com. He emphasized that normal arms trade cooperation between the two sides complies with international law and international practices, adding that such engagements are not targeted at any third party. Additionally, the spokesperson reviewed the 13th Beijing Xiangshan Forum, characterizing the 20-year-old event as an open, non-bloc platform that facilitates dialogue across conflicting parties on traditional defense concerns and emerging technological security risks.