Technology & AIAnalysis

China Releases 2025 Directory of Over 6,000 Global Science Journals

The catalog, unveiled at the Pujiang Innovation Forum, covers 55 countries and 23 languages, including 353 Chinese publications.

Share
Science from the young age
Fati K06 via Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 4.0

The Brief

The Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China and partner research bodies officially released the 2025 World-Class Science and Technology Journals Directory on September 12 at the 2026 Pujiang Innovation Forum. The directory encompasses 6,132 scientific and technical periodicals from 55 countries and regions, covering 23 languages. China accounts for 353 of the selected publications. Organizers stated that the benchmark relies on the World Science Citation Database and an evaluation index intended to offer equitable assessment opportunities across languages, particularly for publications from emerging countries and newly founded titles.

Why it matters

Global academic publishing evaluation has long relied heavily on a handful of Western commercial indexing databases, which predominantly favor English-language journals. By constructing a cross-linguistic evaluation system encompassing 23 languages across 55 jurisdictions, this initiative seeks to provide greater visibility for scientific contributions from emerging markets and newly launched publications, potentially diversifying global scholarly communication channels.

China context

China has actively sought to build indigenous, high-caliber academic journals and develop independent research assessment benchmarks. The inclusion of 353 domestic journals in this directory aligns with Beijing's broader push to enhance its institutional voice in scientific governance and reduce unilateral reliance on overseas indexing services for domestic academic evaluations.

Editor's View

EDITOR'S VIEW — Analysis and inference, not factual reporting. The compilation of a multi-language index by the Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China represents an institutional step toward challenging traditional citation hierarchies. While established databases like Web of Science and Scopus retain deeply entrenched prestige among international researchers, China's rollout of an alternative framework reflects a strategic ambition to shape the rules of scholarly evaluation. The long-term significance of this directory will hinge entirely on whether domestic funding agencies, academic promotion committees, and international publishers treat it as a credible, transparent, and durable benchmark rather than an insular policy metric.

What to watch

  • Whether Chinese universities and grant-making bodies adopt the 2025 directory into formal academic promotion and evaluation criteria.
  • The release of the full catalog and detailed methodology by the Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China.
  • Responses from major international academic publishers and indexing databases regarding the new evaluation framework.

Key Takeaways

  • 1The 2025 World-Class Science and Technology Journals Directory was unveiled on September 12 at the 2026 Pujiang Innovation Forum.
  • 2Compiled by ISTIC and partner research institutes, the directory comprises 6,132 journals from 55 countries and regions across 23 languages.
  • 3China accounts for 353 of the selected scientific journals.
  • 4The listing uses the World Science Citation Database and an evaluation index aimed at ensuring fair opportunities for emerging nations and new titles.
On September 12, the 2025 World-Class Science and Technology Journals Directory was officially launched at the opening ceremony of the 2026 Pujiang Innovation Forum, according to a report by People's Daily. The compilation was led by the Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China (ISTIC) in coordination with partner research institutions. The catalog includes 6,132 science and technology journals distributed across 55 countries and regions, representing 23 distinct languages. Within the total selection, 353 journals are from China. According to forum organizers, the listing was established using the World Science Citation Database alongside an evaluation indicator system tailored specifically for world-class science and technology periodicals. Organizers emphasized that the directory is designed to establish an impartial assessment framework across varying geographic regions and language backgrounds. By evaluating publications across a wider linguistic spectrum, the index aims to grant periodicals from emerging economies and newly launched academic ventures equal visibility alongside legacy international journals. State media reported that the project is intended to support the high-quality development of scholarly publishing, optimize the global academic environment, and facilitate international scientific cooperation. The release takes place amid broader domestic efforts to elevate China's scientific publishing sector. Global academic evaluation systems have historically centered on major commercial databases that predominantly feature English-language outputs from North America and Western Europe. By cataloging non-English titles across dozens of jurisdictions, the new listing seeks to address longstanding imbalances in how non-Western scientific outputs are recognized. While the listing marks an ambitious effort to formalize alternative citation metrics, the practical impact of the directory will depend largely on its transparency and adoption. Analysts will be monitoring how widely the framework is integrated into Chinese institutional assessments and whether foreign publishing houses engage with its underlying evaluation criteria.