Policy & RegulationAnalysis

China Issues Cost Accounting Rules to Curb Industrial Price Wars

New joint guidance from NDRC and SAMR establishes accounting benchmarks to identify predatory pricing in key manufacturing sectors.

Share
A calendar marked with "Tax Deadline" surrounded by financial documents and eyeglasses.
Photo by Leeloo The First on Pexels

The Brief

China's National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) and the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) have jointly issued a circular establishing standardized cost accounting rules for key industrial products to combat predatory pricing and irrational competition. Under the new rules, enforcement authorities will evaluate alleged below-cost selling primarily using an enterprise's individual production costs, relying on audited books, capacity utilization rates, and matching expenses. If individual costs cannot be determined, regulators may benchmark against industry-average costs calculated with a downward margin.

Why it matters

Fierce price wars across Chinese manufacturing sectors have eroded industry profits, curbed research spending, and complicated overseas trade relations. Previous anti-dumping and price regulations lacked explicit technical methodologies to establish whether a firm was selling below production cost. By providing a clear accounting framework for both individual corporate costs and sector-wide benchmarks, the new rules give market regulators concrete operational tools to penalize cutthroat price competition and shift market focus toward product quality and innovation.

China context

Rapid manufacturing capacity additions across both mature and emerging industrial goods in China have periodically triggered intense 'involutionary' price competition. Top policymakers have signaled an intent to clean up irrational competition through legal and price-regulation mechanisms rather than administrative production curbs alone. The coordination between the top economic planner and market overseers indicates an institutionalized approach to enforcing fair pricing while urging industry associations to play a greater self-regulatory role.

Editor's View

EDITOR'S VIEW — Analysis and inference, not factual reporting. The circular's dual mechanism—prioritizing audited individual accounting records while allowing industry averages with downward adjustments when records are unavailable—demonstrates a pragmatic regulatory design. Proving predatory pricing has historically stumbled on corporate bookkeeping ambiguities. However, the true test will rest on how industry associations calculate average costs without creating uncompetitive price floors or cartels, and whether provincial regulators can enforce these accounting baselines consistently across diverse manufacturing hubs.

What to watch

  • Which manufacturing sector associations first release formal industry-average cost benchmarks under ministry guidance
  • Whether the NDRC or SAMR publishes initial enforcement cases or price-investigation decisions under the new rules
  • How provincial development and market regulation authorities coordinate local accounting investigations

Key Takeaways

  • 1The NDRC and SAMR jointly issued a circular establishing standardized cost accounting guidelines for key industrial goods.
  • 2Cost assessments will primarily use a firm's audited individual production records, factoring in capacity utilization and price-matching expenses.
  • 3If individual costs cannot be determined, regulators may reference industry-average costs with a downward margin calculated by industry bodies under official oversight.
  • 4The policy provides operational tools under the Price Law to deter 'involutionary' price wars and shift industrial competition toward quality and innovation.
China's National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) and the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) have jointly released a circular outlining cost accounting rules to tackle irrational and disorderly low-price competition in key industrial product sectors, according to state media reports. The regulatory directive aims to strengthen the institutional framework for enforcing China's Price Law, which prohibits business operators from engaging in unfair pricing practices such as predatory pricing. While existing laws ban sales below cost, authorities noted that prior regulations remained largely principled and lacked concrete, actionable standards for calculating production costs during anti-dumping or price-gouging probes. According to an NDRC official interpreting the measures, the circular clarifies the responsible entities, scope, and technical methodologies for cost calculation. As a foundational principle, regulatory assessments will evaluate an enterprise's individual production cost for a specific product. These individual cost calculations must rely on audited records or complete accounting documentation provided by the firm. The methodology mandates that calculated costs and expenses correspond directly to what the product sales price covers, while accounting for the impact of capacity utilization rates on per-unit costs. In circumstances where a company's individual production costs cannot be directly determined, the circular permits authorities to reference the product's industry-average cost, applying a designated downward floating margin. Industry-average costs are to be surveyed and formulated through either census or sampling methods by industry associations and relevant institutions, operating under the guidance of the NDRC, SAMR, and relevant sectoral authorities. The NDRC and SAMR will organize cost investigations when necessary, while provincial-level development and reform commissions and market supervision bureaus are instructed to carry out enforcement under national unified guidance. Officials emphasized that the policy seeks to encourage enterprise compliance, stimulate industry self-discipline, and redirect competition away from blunt price slashes toward innovation and higher product standards.